Habitat suitability models as tools for implementing the “ecohydraulic trinity” — ASN Events
  1. Schedule
  2. S10. Integrating ecohydraulic aspects across river restoration, environmental flows and fish passage
  3. Ecohydraulic Trilogy: Flows, Passage and Restoration (S10)
  4. Habitat suitability models as tools for implementing the “ecohydraulic trinity”

Habitat suitability models as tools for implementing the “ecohydraulic trinity” (#182)

Claudio Comoglio 1 , Piotr Parasiewicz 2 , Paolo Vezza 1 , Olle Calles 3
  1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Ambiente, del Territorio e delle Infrastrutture, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
  2. The Stanislaw Sakowicz Inland Fisheries Institute, Olsztyn, Poland
  3. River Ecology and Management, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden

Habitat suitability models are being widely used for the simulation, under different spatial and temporal scales, of the instream habitat availability for aquatic and riparian species or communities. Their great potential can be also exploited for designing natural like fish-passes in the implementation of the so-called “ecohydraulic trinity”: environmental flows (e-flows) assessment, re-establishing river continuity and designing river restoration measures. Indeed, nature-like fish passes can provide both e-flow releases and suitable habitat not only for fish, but for the entire aquatic community. We discuss from a theoretical point of view the potential of the integrated application of these modelling tools with particular regard to the microhabitat and mesohabitat scale approaches (e.g., PHABSIM, Bovee et al., 1982, MesoHABSIM, Parasiewicz et al., 2013). Advantages and limitations of each approach are highlighted and the application domain of each modeling approach is assessed. Results show, on the one hand, the advantages of the mesohabitat scale when channel slope and morphological complexity increase. Whereas, on the other hand, the microhabitat scale demostrates effectiveness to evaluate potential habitat for motionless organisms, such as, freshwater pearl mussels. Limitations are related to the application of established hydraulic simulation models in the case of coarse substrate, limited water depth and gradient higher than 2%.

  1. Bovee, K.D.: A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (1982)
  2. Parasiewicz, P., Rogers, J.N., Vezza, P., Gortazar, J., Seager, T., Pegg, M., Wiśniewolski, W., Comoglio, C.: Applications of the MesoHABSIM Simulation Model. In: Maddock I., H.A., Kemp P. and Wood P. (ed.) Ecohydraulics: an integrated approach 2013, pp. 109-124 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Full Paper