Delivery of environmental water under contentious water reform. Learning by doing to improve water delivery and government-manager-community-scientist working relationships. (#162)
Management frameworks that
view freshwater systems as coupled social-ecological systems, are stakeholder
driven and use ‘learning by doing’ adaptive management approaches are
repeatedly being advocated for within IWRM. Adaptive Management, often
described as a ‘learning by doing’ methodology is supposed to deal with the
complexities within freshwater resource management, including environmental
flow programs. Although proposed more than 20 years ago, logical and forward
thinking, adaptive management has failed to become the dominant management
strategy within freshwater resource management, suffering from the theory
(academic) to application (management) dilemma. Strategic Adaptive Management
(SAM) is based on adaptive management principles, but has an explicit focus on
integrating social aspirations, management strategies and scientific
experimentation into decision making, not specifically concentrating on
scientific experimentation to form the basis of the process. This paper will present the design and application of a
SAM framework within the flow programs in the Edward-Wakool river system, a
semi-arid dryland anabranch system of the Murray River in Australia.
Environmental flows have been delivered under the SAM framework for the
previous 5 years to aid in meeting a stakeholder agreed upon vision of
re-instating ‘ A self-sustaining native fish community within a vibrant rural
community’. Included in the talk is the stakeholder engagement and conflict
strategy, management implications from the TPC approach and monitoring, how
scientific data is used in management planning, and the associated learning to
inform and adapt management. The ability (or inability) for managers,
scientists and community to collaborate to reach outcomes will also be
discussed.